I think your friend was using another screenreader. Below, I will
address another or two of your issues.
tc wrote:
...
>Btw, am I the only one on the list who still uses jfw 3.0? I can't
> help thinking that upgrading with most things is an expensive nightmare. As
> long as 3.0 works, I intend to hang on to it.
There are still people using all the versions of jfw.
> My greatest respects and
> admiration to those of you who are adventurous enough to get into script
> writing, and who areAR successful at it. I'm afraid all that [+this +that =
> stuff is over my head. Thanks, tc
one reason for upgrading is that scripts are simpler to write and
better explained.
>
> -
> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
--
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
Touching The Internet:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301.949.7599
ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman
http://poehlman.clark.net
Dynamic Solutions Inc.
Best of service
for your small business
network needs!
http://www.dnsolutions.com
---sig off---
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
