TC,
I have been using JFW for years, since JFW 1.1, and I have never had one
with that kind of personalty! Please do not be offened by my question, but
did you, personally, see or hear your friends version of JFW on her
computer say those kinds of remarks? I ask because, while I know
absolutely nothing about your friend, I am the kind of guy that will get my
friends all stirred up by telling them my programs do incredible things
that their same programs will not do. Is there any chance your friend
could be doing the same thing to you? <big grin>
BTW: what does TC stand for?
REM (Ron)
At 11:41 PM 5/10/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi list:
>I have something on my mind. I have a friend whose jfw will read things in
>a way my jfw won't. For example, years ago when she was on geinne, she
>would be trying to get into a program called procom, at least I think
>that's what it was called, anyway, when she made a mistake, her jfw would
>say, "I think we'resupposed to be in procom, but we're not there" And
>also, when her jfw comes across something it can't read, he says "sorry, I
>can't read this. It is hidden behind a picture" or something like that. My
>jfw doesn't do anything like that. When he comes across something he can't
>read, he doesn't say anything, not even the word blank. Now, why does her
>jfw have more personality than mine? Is it because she has the $900
>internal synth card and I have the $120 flex talk software synth? Really
>curious. Btw, am I the only one on the list who still uses jfw 3.0? I can't
>help thinking that upgrading with most things is an expensive nightmare. As
>long as 3.0 works, I intend to hang on to it. My greatest respects and
>admiration to those of you who are adventurous enough to get into script
>writing, and who areAR successful at it. I'm afraid all that [+this +that =
>stuff is over my head. Thanks, tc
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
