Hi, I've been playing around with an editor called Arachnophilia, which I got from the download area at http://www.thesocket.com/~henrich It seems to work well and I like its preview feature. I have a version of Front Page Express which seems to work okay, too. My version is 2.0.2.1118. The newer version that is bundled with IE5, unfortunately, doesn't talk worth beans. I found that when I loaded an HTML file into it and tried to review its contents, I got results similar to using Acrobat Reader without the access plug-in. It was ugly, really ugly and had me swearing vociferously at Microsoft after only a couple of minutes. Definitely a step backward in terms of accessibility, so if you look for Front Page Express, avoid the latest version. Cheers! Tom - Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
- Re: html editors that work well with j... Steve Matzura
- Re: html editors that work well with j... David Poehlman
- Re: html editors that work well w... Derek Lane
- Re: html editors that work we... David Poehlman
- Re: html editors that work well with j... Derek Lane
- Re: html editors that work well w... Krajczar Tech Center, Damon Fibraio
- Re: html editors that work we... Derek Lane
- Re: html editors that work we... Jimmy A. Podsim
- Re: html editors that work well with j... Corey Knapp
- Re: html editors that work well w... Derek Lane
- Re: html editors that work well with j... Tom Lange
- Re: html editors that work well w... Derek Lane
- Outlook Express 4 &5 acti... David Edick
- Re: html editors that work we... Jim Hunt
- RE: html editors that work well with j... Jonathan Mosen
- RE: html editors that work well w... David Truong
- Fwd: Re: html editors that work well w... Arnaud de Bonald
