If you don't like jfw, what are you doing over here then. I don't use
window-eyes, but I don't go on their list to complain about them either.
At 09:05 AM 8/9/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi listers,
>I usually Window-Eyes from GW Micro but thought I would try the demo of
JFW 3.3
>
>I am very unhappy with it because of the fucus issues it has under Win 95.
>
>an example of this is when I am in ICQ, and I go to another application,
>the JFW cursor has very difficult time in telling me where I am.
>Window-Eyes is 100000 times better at this.
>I hate to bring you JAWS users down, but I would not buy JFW if u gave me a
>million dollars for it.
>I will agree though, it does work in some applications like IE, but still I
>don't like JFW at all.
>There could be many improvements like Window-Eyes is better.
>WE is a lot better than JFW
>
>I don't want to bash JFW, but JFW should stand for Junk for Windows
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
Walter
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
