I have have both JFW 3.2 and 3.3 installed on my system here, too. The
main reason is that JFW 3.3 thus far does not have me much convinced with
its stability nor being better at handling the applications I am using.
People tell me 3.3 is supposed to be better at working with chat, telnet l
and other programs, but I haven't really seen that for myself. I find that
3.3 is pretty y lousy with Eudora Pro 3.05 that I am using while Sharky 3.2
works just fine with it. (If somebody can give me any hints on getting 3.3
to work better with Eudora, please mail me privately - or the list if you
consider it relevant for all of us out here.)
I keep 3.3 installed on my drive and experiment with it occasionally. I
have different shortcuts set up to brig up the different versions of
Sharky. If 3.3 were better at handling chat programs, for example, I figure
I would use it if I were using those programs while sticking with 3.2 when
doing mail. I also keep hoping that the .31 patch will bring some real
improvements that will make 3.3 more workable for me personally as well.
Cheers,
Doris
At 10:39 AM 8/14/99 -0400, you wrote:
>For those who have 3.3:
>Do you have a path/directory for both versions on your computers? If so, why
>would you have both versions able to work on your system?
>Mark GTG
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
Chip & Dale ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
