I don't know why you singled me out to support h-j, I didn't think I was a
jaws-can-do-no-wrong supporter.
I was merely answering the original questioners questions as to what the
paths were to different versions of jaws, and why someone would keep earlier
versions on their disk.
However, since you did, I'll do my best to name some enhancements in jfw3.3
and hope you can pick five you like:
Read or Navigate by Sentence or Paragraph
SayAll by Sentences or Paragraphs
Read Blank Lines in SayAll
Skip Ahead to Next Unit
JAWS Message Voice
System Tray Dialog Box
Text Attribute and Formatting Announcements
Auto Graphics Labeler
Grade 2 Braille Translation
HJPad
Window List
Key Labeling/Silencing
Announcement of Cursor Shape
Mouse Click Interrupts Speech
Hope this helps,
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: scott fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 1999 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: 3.2 with 3.3
>
>
> I ho9nestly feel that jfw has taken a step backward with jfw33. Jfw32 was
> as good or better, more stable then jfw33 is. Why we were subject to
paying
> for this update is beyond me.
>
> This really isn't fair. For the few changes, a couple of which don't work,
> this is not what I would call a fair exchange.
>
> I have been using jfw since 1990, one of its beginning members, and will
> always use the software, but I think since all of us continually tell jfw
> that we are so true blue, will always stick with them no matter what, they
> seem to feel that they can put out a placebo and will go crazy over it!
>
> Ridiculous to me.
>
> I don't see one thing that makes this this version that much better then
> jfw32 was, and I'd like you to give an example of something, no, five
> things that really make jfw33 so much better that we had to pay $150 for
> this update.
>
>
> Scott
> At 11:31 AM 8/14/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >Yes you have two paths on your system until you uninstall 3.2. They are:
> >c:\jfw32 and c:\jfw33.
> >In your start menu, under programs, you have two choices, jfw32 and
jfw33.
> >If you select jfw32 you get the older version of jfw.
> >
> >Those of us who keep the older version of jfw do so to be able to go back
to
> >it if the newer one has a problem with an application that we use often.
I
> >usually keep an older version around until I am satisfied that there will
be
> >no nasty surprises lurking with the latest version. I will probably keep
> >jfw32 around until jfw331 is available.
> >Thanks,
> >Bob
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: JFWLIST <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Saturday, August 14, 1999 9:39 AM
> >Subject: 3.2 with 3.3
> >
> >
> >> For those who have 3.3:
> >> Do you have a path/directory for both versions on your computers? If
so,
> >why
> >> would you have both versions able to work on your system?
> >> Mark GTG
> >>
> >> -
> >> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
> >>
> >
> >-
> >Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
> >
> >
> mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
