A fair judgement. rgds roopa --- On Fri, 13/6/08, Gladson Dungdung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Gladson Dungdung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [ =>> Jharkhand <<= ] HC dismisses plea against Tribal Christians' ST status To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, 13 June, 2008, 4:14 PM HC dismisses plea against Tribal Christians' ST status Pioneer News Service | Ranchi The Jharkhand High Court on Thursday rejected the petitioners' plea that challenged the continuation of reservation and other privilege to Tribals who have converted to Christianity and other religions. In 2002, petitioner Karpara Hansda and wife of Sangram Besra had filed a PIL, followed by another writ by Baliram Marandi, in which they sought to debar Tribals converted to Christianity and other religions from availing the reservation and other benefits that are extended to all members of Scheduled Tribes as per the Constitution. Karpara Hansda contended that just as Scheduled Castes or Dalit Christians are denied reservations and other benefits and protections on conversion from Hinduism to another religion, so also should tribals who convert to Christianity should be denied such benefits and protections. The petitioner further tried to show that on conversion the converted tribals no longer adhere to many of their former traditions and culture and the difference is "in black and white", and since there is this loss or negation of culture and tradition they should no longer be regarded as Scheduled Tribes and hence they should not be given those benefits. Meanwhile, this year an intervener petition was also filed by Christopher Kispotta, a Christian and PC Murmu, a traditional faith person, opposing the contentions and prayers of the petitioners that converted Tribals are no longer members of Scheduled Tribes and hence no longer entitled to protections and benefits. The intervener petitioners on their petition submitted that Article 366 of the Constitution specifies Scheduled Tribes from existing tribes, which is that it builds on existing primordial identities of the tribes. The interveners also cited definitions of Tribals and indigenous peoples as defined in international legal texts such as the International Labour Organisation Convention 107 and a certain World Bank document, which comprehensively account for these communities. They also submitted that to deny converted Tribals ST status and benefits merely on change of religion to Christianity would be racist. Advocate for petitioner NK Sahani, Government's counsel Sumeet Gadodia and interveners' lawyer Ratnaker Bhengra made brief arguments. The Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice MY Eqbal and Justice DK Sinha after hearing the arguments, and after referring to the 2004 Supreme Court judgement in State of Kerela verses Chandramohanan which lays down, "... as a broad proposition of law it cannot be accepted that merely by change of religion a person ceases to be a member of the Scheduled Tribe,...", rejected the contentions and prayers of the petitioners and dismissed the writs. http://www.dailypio neer.com/ indexn12. asp?main_ variable= RANCHI&file_name=Ranchi2% 2Etxt&counter_img= 2 -- Jharkhand Network | Jharkhand.org. in/network Explore your hobbies and interests. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/
