>>Your utterances betray your "barbaric ignorance" of Hindu religion and >>ethics. This is the phrase used by the late lamented Nirod C. Chaudhury about L.K.Advani when the latter went to meet and seek his blessings.>>> 1.Hindus themselves have beeen a problem in this Country working as spies, traitors and aligning themselves with anti-Hindu organisations as ample evidences and instances shown by history, be it under Muslim rule or British or even after independence, like VP Singh or others. 2. No wonder Hinduism which was followed right from Afghanistan to Bali, has been overcome and reduced to miniscule presence only in India, by traitors working against Hindu-s in the name of secularism. 3. Can you justify your support to Shabna Azmi who has proved herself to be anti-Hindu in all her actions and has not condemned a single incident of killing of Hindus by Muslims or Christians? 4. Law of the land for commercial transactions does not take away the fundamental rights of the owner ensured by the Constitution be it Caste, Religion or Regional considerations. 5.*********************
--- On Tue, 8/26/08, Dr Girish Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Dr Girish Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [ =>> Jharkhand <<= ] Re: Shabana Azmi: Indian democracy unfair to Muslims To: [email protected] Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 5:20 AM Mr. Kumar, Thanks for your intervention. I don't deny your right to sell or not to sell, and rent or not to rent your property, and whom to sell, but, please, do not bring in religion. Commercial transactions must be in accordance with the law of the land not in accordance with your communal approach. Whether Shabana owns four or more properties and where, is irrelevant. So long as the law of the land does not debar a person already holding one or more properties from acquiring further property, he or she cannot be prevented from doing so simply on communal considerations. I don't need a certificate from you about what I am. Whether I am a true or born Hindu or just a convert is none of your business. What my surname means is also irrelevant in the context of present debate. Your utterances betray your "barbaric ignorance" of Hindu religion and ethics. This is the phrase used by the late lamented Nirod C. Chaudhury about L.K.Advani when the latter went to meet and seek his blessings. Please also read Swami Karpatriji's book "Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh and Hindu Dharama". Whether you like it or not, Karpatriji's knowledge of Hindu religion no one from the Parivar could dare question. The publisher of the book Pandit Veerbhadra Mishra, a former professor of enginering at BHU and the present Mahanth of Sankat Mochan, Varanasi, is still alive and, if you like, you can procure a copy of this bok to enlighten yourself. Kindly, keep your communalism and "barbaric ignorance" under the wrap. Girish Mishra > Dr.Mishra, > > The same constitutional rights empower me to exercise my rights whether > to rent out my property to whom, when and how, and nobody can claim the > right to be a tenant by force or such pseudo constitutional rights. > > You might term it Religious discrimination. But I term it as my solemn > rights of the property I own and how to use it. > > It appears your name Mishra is a misnomer and you are neither a vegetarian > nor perhaps a Hindu, but a convert active in Jharkand. A Vegetarian known > his abhorrence if his neighbour walks in with the freshly flayed leg of a > lamb dangling from his hand with dripping blood. > > Constitutionally a Co-operative Society or a Company is treated as an > entity for such purposes on decisions taken by a majority. > > It was revealed by the Film body that Shabna already owns four apartments > in Mumbai besides a voilla in Mahabaleshwar and why should she enter an > ambience she is not welcome to? > > Who says majority of Hindu-s are non-vegetarians? That is why Cow > slaughter is banned in all States except West Bengal and Kerala? You > appear to entertain a biassed view against Hindu-s and Hinduism. > > Where does the question of Hitler, subhuman Jews come here? > It is the fundamental right enshrined in Constitution to exercise by right > to rent out my property. The Religious discriminationcomes into play only > when the Govt. comes into picture in allotment of flats or houses from > Govt. housings. > > > --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Dr Girish Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED] a.com> wrote: > > From: Dr Girish Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED] a.com> > Subject: Re: [ =>> Jharkhand <<= ] Re: Shabana Azmi: Indian democracy > unfair to Muslims > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.co.in > Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 7:12 PM > > > > > > > Sorry, Mr. Amit Gupta, I find your argument illogical and wrong. It > betrays your communal approach. Why don't you go by what the Constitution > of India says? It prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, > caste, region, language, gender and colour of the skin. Thus if a person > or a group of persons refuse to sell or rent out property just on the > basis of the religion of the intended buyer or hirer, it's illegal. Please > say whether you abid by the Constitution or throw it in the garbage. > Your implicit assumption is that a Muslim is non-veg, thus unsuitable to a > colony dominated by the Hindus. This argument has no basis in facts. The > overwhelming majority of the Hindus are today non-veg. Traditionally, > Maithils, Kashmiris, Bengalis, Assamese, the people of other NE states, > Sikhs and so on have been non-veg. > Contrary to the Hindu ethos, you believe that all human beings are not > equal, some like Muslims, Christians, etc. are sub-humans. This is what > Hitler believed. He regarded the Jews as sub-humans, thus tried to > exterminate them. Our great sage Tulsi Das says that Ram lives in every > human being, so every human being deserves our regards: "Siya Ram Maya Sub > Jag Jani, Karahin Pranam Jori Jug Pani." Obviously what you say betrays > your ignorance. > Girish Mishra > >> Hi Girish and Venkat and other fello members, >> Â >> I am a keen observer of this group and this so called Girish mishra the >> intellectual seems to be so much in awe of Shabana Azmi, so called >> another >> intellectual and secularist. >> Â >> He is acuusing us of being unfair to muslims just because Shabana was >> denied purchase of a flat.My points are as follows: >> Â >> 1. You can remember denial of one flat but cant remeber to be allowed to >> purchase 10 other flats. I know this is her birth right but equally this >> is birth right of other vegeterian eating people to reject her demands. >> What happens if you are a vegeterian and you have some non vegeterian >> neighbours, being vegeterian i know it myself. >> Â >> 2. When muslim societies reject hindu right to purchase, where the hell >> you go? >> Â >> 3. Being shabana the socisl crusader and ranting about anything on this >> earth (anything related to muslims or progressive india), who the hell >> want her as a neigbour. We are pretty happy in our peaceful environments >> and share accomodation with people, we are comfortable with. >> Â >> We never wanted a shabana the hell raiser as a neghbour, its as simple >> as >> that. >> Â >> Because of people like Mr. girish, people like Shabana and MF hussain >> gets >> so called importance, which they do not deserver rightly. >> Â >> Warm Regards to my fello jharkhndis and Indians, >> Â >> Amit P Gupta >> >> "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
