Some hard questions

Although all newspapers and TV channels used the same source, the police, they 
differed in the basic facts reported about the police encounter in Jamia 
Nagar.  THE DELHI UNION OF JOURNALISTS presents a critique of media reporting 
of the Batla House Police Operation.
 
Posted Saturday, Oct 04 19:00:37, 2008

                                  Extracts from the DUJ report
 
 
 
Foreword
 
The Delhi Union of Journalists and its Ethics Council are concerned at the 
falling standards of reporting as evident in the manner in which the police 
operation at Batla House on September 19, 2008 was reported by various 
newspapers and TV channels in the Capital.
 
We wish to underline that accuracy in reporting facts is the first 
responsibility of the media. Where facts are disputed, the discrepancies should 
be pointed out and the sources questioned. Presenting several versions of 
incidents and using multiple sources of information is an inalienable part of 
credible reporting.
 
We also emphasise that uncovering the truth may not always be the job of the 
media. The media is not equipped to investigate and uncover the truth in 
severely complicated cases like the incident being examined in the report.
 
But presenting different facets of events as they emerge is part of the 
professional responsibility of the media.
 
In this report we have analysed the reporting of the Times of India, The 
Hindustan Times, The Hindu, The Indian Express (Delhi editions of September 20 
and 21, 2008).  Among the Hindi newspapers we have examined Dainik Jagaran, 
Amar Ujala, Dainik Hindustan, Jansatta, Punjab Kesari and Rashtriya Sahara; the 
Urdu newspaper we looked at is Rashtriya Sahara.
 
We wish to make it clear that we hold no brief for either the police or the 
suspects, two of whom have been killed and several rounded up.  We are not 
passing a judgment on whether it was a planned encounter or a fake encounter or 
a police operation gone wrong. We do not know the truth. We are only examining 
the professional conduct of our co-professionals with a view to pointing out 
the casual manner in which serious issues have been handled right from the day 
of the serial bomb blasts in Delhi.
 
A research team of the DUJ decided to examine the way in which the print media 
reported the police operation on September 19, 2008, at L-18, Batla House, 
Jamia Nagar in Delhi in which two alleged terrorists and one inspector of the 
Special Cell of the Delhi Police were killed. We have attempted in this report 
to first state the facts as they were reported and then analyse the language 
employed and the views expressed while reporting and commenting on this highly 
sensitive and contentious incident. 
 
 
Analysis of Newspaper Reports dated September 20, 2008
 
The facts first.
 
1. Inspector Mohan Chand Sharma of the Special Cell of the Delhi Police killed.
 
2. Two young boys, Atif Amin and Mohammed Sajid, killed.
 
3. Mohammed Saif arrested.
 
The rest of the facts regarding the police operation at L-18, Batla House, 
Jamia Nagar, Delhi on Sept. 19, 2008 are uncertain. Although the incident took 
place in the capital of India and all the newspapers and TV channels used the 
same source, the Police, even the basic facts are not in place. Every daily 
newspaper and television channel seems to have its own set of 'facts' and often 
these contradict each other. Accuracy seems to have been sacrificed in the rush 
to be first with the news and provide the more sensational coverage. Let us 
examine how the incident was reported in the Delhi editions of the dailies.
 
The Time of the Shootout:
 
The Hindustan Times and Dainik Jagran have given the time as 11 a.m. The Indian 
Express, quoting a resident, says the first shot was fired around 9.45 a.m. The 
Times of India report does not mention any time. Mail Today says it began at 
11a.m. The Hindi Hindustan report would have us believe that it all began at 
10.30 a.m. Amar Ujala says firing began around 10.45 a.m. and lasted till 11 
a.m.
 
The Duration of the Shootout: 
 
The Hindustan Times says the shootout lasted 15 minutes whereas its Hindi 
publication, Dainik Hindustan,  says it lasted 90 minutes. According to the 
TOI, the entire encounter took 25 minutes. Mail Today says the operation lasted 
30 minutes. The Veer Arjun says the shootout lasted between 30 and 45 minutes. 
Rashtriya Sahara, Urdu, claims that the shooting lasted nearly two hours. Amar 
Ujala says the encounter lasted  1 hour and 15 minutes. Punjab Kesari claims 
that  the encounter lasted one hour.
 
Rounds fired:
 
According to the TOI, 25 rounds were fired by the police and 8 by the 
'terrorists'. The Indian Express, the Hindu, Dainik Hindustan, Punjab Kesari 
and Rashtriya Sahara, Urdu say the police fired 22 rounds. They are all silent 
about the rounds fired by the suspects. Rashtriya Sahara, Hindi and Amar Ujala 
say the police fired 22 rounds and the 'terrorists' fired 8 rounds.
 
Interestingly, the Navbharat Times claims that both the police and the suspects 
were armed with AK 47s but did not use them!
 
'Explosive' stuff:
 
All the dailies reported the police claim that those shot at Batla House were 
terrorists responsible for several bomb blasts.
 
The HT quoted Police Commissioner Y S Dadwal as saying that "explosives made by 
him (Atif – our clarification) and his team bore their signature – two 
detonators, wooden frame, ammonium nitrate and analog quartz clocks."
 
In the light of this claim, the list of explosives claimed to have been 
recovered from the flat occupied by the suspects is interesting. 
 
Dainik Hindustan says one AK 47, two pistols, one computer and important papers 
were recovered.
 
Veer Arjun reports one AK 47, .30 bore pistols, cartridges and 21 country 
pistols were found.
 
Navbharat Times says one AK 47, two .30 imported pistols, 20 live cartridges, 
magazine, two laptops, mobile phones and other items were recovered. 
 
Rashtriya Sahara, Hindi says police recovered one AK 47 and two .32 bore 
pistols, one computer and books.
 
Punjab Kesari says police found one AK 47, two pistols  and one computer.
 
Amar Ujala says the police  seized one AK 47, .30 bore revolver, two laptops, 
half a dozen mobiles and six pen drives.
 
None of the dailies report the recovery of any ammonium nitrate and analog 
quartz clocks. No question is asked about the recovery of these chemicals or 
equipment claimed to be part of the terrorist group's signature. 
 
How many Policemen were there?
 
Indian Express reports that Sharma went there along with five officers.
Mail Today reports a 15-member team led by Sharma
Veer Arjun claims 50 personnel led by Sharma landed there.
NBT says a total number of 24 police personnel went there.
Amar Ujala reports that a 22-member police team cordoned off the area under the 
leadership of Sharma.
 
The TOI, HT, Jansatta, Dainik Jagran and The Hindu refrain from mentioning the 
number of policemen involved in the operation.
 
How many Bullets hit Sharma?
 
The TOI, IE, HT, Mail Today, The Hindu, Veer Arjun, Rashtriya Sahara, Hindi all 
say three bullets hit Sharma.
 
Navbharat Times says four bullets hit him.
 
Jansatta claims that five bullets hit him in the abdomen, thigh, left arm, 
upper part of the shoulder and right hip (Anchor story).
 
Rashtriya Sahara, Urdu reports four bullets hitting him, one each on shoulder, 
arm, back and right hip.
 
Rashtriya Sahara, Hindi claims that all the three bullets were taken out during 
an operation in Holy Family hospital
 
Amar Ujala also claims that bullets had been removed and quotes Dr. Rajesh 
Chawla to this effect. It says Dr Chawla was summoned from Apollo hospital. He 
reportedly told the paper that there was excessive bleeding because the bullets 
hit the lung and the lower part and after 'bullets had been removed',  it was 
felt that Sharma may survive.
 
Subsequently post-mortem reports quoted by some of the dailies said that Sharma 
had been hit by only two bullets and both bullets had exited the body. No 
bullets were removed from his body.
 
About Mohan Chand Sharma
 
Even in paying tributes to Inspector Sharma the papers have reported different 
facts.  HT says that he had "shot dead 75 criminals and terrorists." The TOI 
says he was "credited with the killing of 35 terrorists and the arrest of 80 
others." The IE says that "Sharma's 'kill tally' stood at 75 criminals 
including 35 terrorists". The Hindu says he was instrumental in "neutralising 
35 terrorists and arresting as many as 80 militants." It goes on to say he had 
'gunned down 40 gangsters' and arrested '120' criminals. Amar Ujala reports 
that Sharma killed 35 terrorists and 40 gangsters, nabbed 80 terrorists and 129 
gangsters. It says he was involved in 75 encounters.
 
 
 
 
Contact:
 
DELHI UNION OF JOURNALISTS
Office: FLAT NO.-29, New Central Market, Connaught Circus, New Delhi-1
 E-mail:, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 23413459
 



      

Reply via email to