Dear Mr Patnaik:

the present position is that policing, law and order are state subjects.
Solely in the purview of state legislative competence. But the union
government has the police in the capital other union territories and the
paramilitaries under its competence. But the Central government also has not
moved to implement its own Model Police Act which it created. By the way
that act is good in most respects but it is weak on making the police
accountable for wrong doing.

Setting up any constitutional authority would be very difficult and require
changes in the Constitution which would be stoutly resisted by the state
governments and goes against the notion of decentralisation. We, are seeking
to get PRACTICAL CHANGES IN POLICING NOW.  However most recently after the
Mumbai blasts the GOI has set up the National Investigation Agency. We are
presently analysing the Act and will post it on the web and on this list
serv as soon as practicable.

The Home Minister Chidambaram has called a meeting of CMs on 6th January to
convince about this. I think to make them buy into the idea.We have made an
attempt to brief all the principle secretaries and home ministers and chief
ministers about this and sent them materials which I am happy to share if
you want it. It is difficult you will appreciate to have a national
investigative agency when were is no concept of a federal crime as there is
in the USA. But at the same time its important to be able to coordinate the
workings of all governments and intelligence agencies when dealing with
terrorism whether home grown or from abroad.

While appreciating that there must be a response to terrorism, CHRI's
position has been that we need good  everyday policing from our police force
for all the people all the time. Not the policing that we have today. For
this we need:
changes in the way the police are governed - legitimate scrutiny, good
provisioning and no patronage and interference in transfers and career paths
but only general direction on policy matters on behalf of the people with
operational responsibility with the chief of police;
we need changes in the way police are managed by their own adminstration and
leaders. That is to say we need the police to decide with inputs from the
public what the goals of policing in an area should be. Then their
performance can be reviewed at the end of the year. There must be public
involvement in the creation of policing plans, against those plans the
police must be given men, training, equipment and then there must be
objective indicators against which their performance must be judged. All
this can be put before the assembly and reviewed so that everyday
performance improves year by year.
Finally the police must be accountable. As you can see from above they must
be accountable both for delivering good everyday policing to the
satisfaction of the people but there also must be mechanisms for ensuring
that wrongdoing is duely and fairly punished. So  there must be civilian
oversight, which means they have to be accountable only to the law. The way
this has to be done is to make sure they are brought to book whenever they
do wrong: through parliamentary oversight, through human rights commissions,
through new complaints authorities that are local and close to people at
district and state level; and through much more transparent internal inquiry
systems.

If all this is done with honesty of purpose we will have a world class
police. The Supreme Court Orders to the state and centre have said just this
must be done. But there is no political will to take reforms in the police
forward. At present there has been little compliance with the Courts orders.
I would like to suggest some action points for people reading this:

   -  There is a monitoring committee set up under K. T. Thomas which is
   asking the states what they have done to comply with the SC orders. They
   will be submitting their report to the SC by March I think. The Committee
   needs citizens like the ones reading this note to get involved with
   informing them about developments in the states.Write to the Commitee and to
   the State government indicating you want them to obey the Supreme Courts
   orders
   - Contact political parties and  your local MP who will be campaiging for
   your vote and insist that police reforms of the type the Court has mandated
   become an election promise in their manifestos and that they say what
   changes they are going to bring in in the first 100 days of the next
   government.
   - Get questions asked in the Assemblies about the extent of compliance
   with the SC orders
   - hold meetings with your own friends and networks to explain where the
   situation is at present and discuss how to take it forward and more into the
   public. This is a most important activity because people are not used to
   talking about police reforms. We will be glad to offer what assistance a
   little team can.

Hope this is useful to you and other readers,

Maja Daruwala
-- 
Maja Daruwala
Director
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative
B-117, First Floor, Sarvodaya Enclave
New Delhi, INDIA, 110017
Tel No 91 11 26864678:26850523 (O)

Reply via email to