hi dennis, thank you for your comments and viewpoint on jaxb2 and jibx2. i can see that jibx and jaxb are still very different beasts. there may be more overlap in v2 but the differences are still significant.
i most enjoyed the two articles you referenced. most articles i read on generics are fairly superficial and don't usually go as deep as yours: by discussion how to actually introspect the generic type information. your article on annotations [vs config files] makes one thing clear: that annotations are not necessarily an improvement over jibx's existing mechanism for specifying an o/x mapping. i still like the idea of using a jibx namespace to annotate an xml schema definition, specifically a relaxng definition. i personally really enjoy more general types of discussions on xml data binding. the majority of the threads on the mailing list pertain to specific jibx issues. i believe such discussions can be a great source of creativity and ideas, and hope to see more of them on the list in the months to come. / eitan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
