Hi Shura, I have pushed the changeset to jdk9/dev.
Mandy > On Nov 19, 2015, at 8:40 AM, Alexandre (Shura) Iline > <alexandre.il...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Yes, sorry. > > Since the methods do not have any work to complete before interrupting and > also methods are not used anywhere currently, I assume re-throwing the > InterruptedException is a better choice. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8139430/webrev.07/test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/management/ThreadMXBeanTool.java.html > > Shura > >> On Nov 16, 2015, at 8:33 PM, Mandy Chung <mandy.ch...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 16, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 16/11/2015 13:01, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote: >>>> V6: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8139430/webrev.06/ >>>> >>>> >>> This looks okay to me. For completeness then I assume the >>> THreadMXBeanTool.waitUntilXXX methods should re-assert the interrupt status >>> if interrupted when waiting. >> >> +1 >> >> Mandy >> >
