> Gesendet: Dienstag, 01. Dezember 2015 um 16:24 Uhr > Von: "Alessio Stalla" <alessiosta...@gmail.com> > An: "Paul Benedict" <pbened...@apache.org> > Cc: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net > Betreff: Re: Feature complete? > [...] > Mind you, Spring is just an example, it is no different in that > regard from typical dynamic languages. In fact, I'm pressed to hear how the > Nashorn team is reacting to Jigsaw.
I am also wondering how a dynamic language is supposed to achieve full encapsulation in terms of the module system. If there needs to be a call from inside the runtime (and most dynamic languages will require that), then the runtime needs to have access to multiple modules, totally bypassing the encapsulation between them. I would like to support full encapsulation in Groovy if possible... without command line acrobatics... but the only way I see is doing those checks in the groovy runtime ourselves. And that means the check will be basically in the callsite generation code. bye Jochen
