module z {
exports z;
provides z.Main with z.Main;
}
The SOTM says "Service-provider declarations can be further interpreted to
ensure that providers (e.g., com.mysql.jdbc.Driver) actually do implement
their declared service interfaces" (section 4, para. 8).
I see javac checking that they are related types, but javac is not checking
that "provides" is an interface type. That is what I was expecting based on
the reading material.
The other unexpected outcome was that provides/with allows the identical
type. I don't know if that's intended, but please advise.
PS: I did go through the open tickets this time (thanks Alan) and do not
see any similar reports. If I missed it, I apologize; just trying not to
waste your time by reporting a duplicate.
Cheers,
Paul
