> How about the following helper method on ModulePool:
> 
>  Optional<LinkModule> findModule(ModuleEntry me);
> 
> then the intent in code might be a littler clearer on the context.

After thinking about this at bit: If we did that and then later worked out a 
way to optimize across modules, we’d have to hunt down those cases.    What if 
I were to rename the method to findEntryInContext(String path, ModuleEntry 
context)?

— Jim


> On Jul 11, 2016, at 11:15 AM, James Laskey <james.las...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jul 11, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 11 Jul 2016, at 14:17, Jim Laskey (Oracle) <james.las...@oracle.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’m not sure if we can determine supplied classes vs others unless we 
>>> provide a flag or the set of supplied modules.  At any rate, the rules for 
>>> cross module optimization would still be complex.
>> 
>> Ok.
>> 
>> 
>>> ModuleEntry.findEntry: I was half thinking the same once I realized the 
>>> limits of the lookup.  The complication is that a ModuleEntry may exist in 
>>> several pools (direct copy).  So, though we have to create new LinkModules 
>>> each pass, we would also be forced to create new ModuleEntrys for each 
>>> pass.  In practice, I’m not sure findEntry will be used frequently in 
>>> relation to the #plugins x #classes.
>> 
>> Ah, i see, so the rule being: go back to the pool to query for stuff.
>> 
>> How about the following helper method on ModulePool:
>> 
>>  Optional<LinkModule> findModule(ModuleEntry me);
>> 
>> then the intent in code might be a littler clearer on the context.
>> 
> 
> Ok
> 
>> 
>> ImagePluginStack
>> 
>> 407             return res.isPresent()? 
>> Optional.of(getUncompressed(res.get())) : Optional.empty();
>> 
>> You could do:
>> 
>> return res.map(this::getUncompressed);
>> 
> 
> Good
> 
> 
>> 
>> ClassForNamePLugin
>> 
>> 148             .filter(resource -> resource != null)
>> 
>> Can a resource ever be null?
> 
> I don't think it can. Just cloning JFs code. Might have true at some point. 
> Will drop and see what falls out. 
> 
>> 
>> Paul.
> 

Reply via email to