FXLauncherTest.java should fail until FX change [1] is integrated and promoted (target for jdk-9+164). I suggest to rerun the test after jdk-9+164 is promoted and sync down to jdk9/dev and jake.
Mandy [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177751 > On Apr 5, 2017, at 7:35 PM, Amy Lu <amy...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi, Alan > > I noticed test tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fails with > jigsaw-nightly-h6277-20170404 (on Windows platform). Is that because related > OpenJFX changes are not yet in the mentioned build? > > Thanks, > Amy > > On 4/5/17 12:28 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: >> As I mentioned on jigsaw-dev yesterday, we have accumulated a number of >> changes in the jake forest and would like to bring the changes into jdk9/dev >> for jdk-9+165. >> >> Most of the changes in this update are the move of Module and friends from >> java.lang.reflect to java.lang. This is mostly a mechanical update. >> >> We also have the update to the derivation of automatic modules to no longer >> ignore trailing digits in modules names, this is to align JDK 9 with the >> updated proposal for issue #VersionsInModuleNames [1]. >> >> There are a number of smaller changes, summarized in JDK-8177530 [2]. >> >> The webrev with the changes is here: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8177530/1 >> >> The changes are currently based on jdk-9+163 and will be rebased before >> pushing to jdk9/dev. >> >> The corresponding update to jtreg is already in the code-tools/jtreg repo >> and will be tagged (I assume as jtreg4.2-b07) before this integration. Once >> it is tagged then we'll rev'ing the requiredVersion in each TEST.ROOT. >> >> -Alan >> >> [1] >> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/issues/#VersionsInModuleNames >> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177530 >> >> >> >
