FX build for jdk9+164 already was promoted last Friday. The changeset to
use that build was pushed to jdk9/dev on Saturday (as per usual), but
probably wasn't synced down to jdk9/jake.
-- Kevin
Mandy Chung wrote:
FXLauncherTest.java should fail until FX change [1] is integrated and promoted
(target for jdk-9+164). I suggest to rerun the test after jdk-9+164 is
promoted and sync down to jdk9/dev and jake.
Mandy
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177751
On Apr 5, 2017, at 7:35 PM, Amy Lu <amy...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi, Alan
I noticed test tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fails with
jigsaw-nightly-h6277-20170404 (on Windows platform). Is that because related
OpenJFX changes are not yet in the mentioned build?
Thanks,
Amy
On 4/5/17 12:28 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
As I mentioned on jigsaw-dev yesterday, we have accumulated a number of changes
in the jake forest and would like to bring the changes into jdk9/dev for
jdk-9+165.
Most of the changes in this update are the move of Module and friends from
java.lang.reflect to java.lang. This is mostly a mechanical update.
We also have the update to the derivation of automatic modules to no longer
ignore trailing digits in modules names, this is to align JDK 9 with the
updated proposal for issue #VersionsInModuleNames [1].
There are a number of smaller changes, summarized in JDK-8177530 [2].
The webrev with the changes is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8177530/1
The changes are currently based on jdk-9+163 and will be rebased before pushing
to jdk9/dev.
The corresponding update to jtreg is already in the code-tools/jtreg repo and
will be tagged (I assume as jtreg4.2-b07) before this integration. Once it is
tagged then we'll rev'ing the requiredVersion in each TEST.ROOT.
-Alan
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/issues/#VersionsInModuleNames
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177530
