[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17568126#comment-17568126
 ] 

H. Vetinari commented on ARROW-17110:
-------------------------------------

> Slight correction: GCC 4.8 is not an R requirement. It comes from CentOS 7, 
> where it is the default compiler. We do happen to get a number of bug reports 
> from R users on CentOS 7, though.

Centos 7 has the devtoolset backports until GCC 11 (except aarch where it's GCC 
10) though... These are obviously available & in use for the manylinux images, 
and I think they're a very much acceptable requirement for users on such old 
platforms.

> I agree that for now conda-forge can simply build using C++17. Just before 
> [because?] the minimum version for Arrow is C++11 doesn't mean you are 
> forbidden to use a newer one :-D

Well, I would like to avoid breaking your CI if possible. :)
And as I tried to explain, if conda-forge switches to C++17 (especially on 
windows) while you still try to compile with C++11, breakage is 
all-but-guaranteed.

> [C++] Move away from C++11
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-17110
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17110
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: H. Vetinari
>            Priority: Major
>
> The upcoming abseil release has dropped support for C++11, so 
> {_}eventually{_}, arrow will have to follow. More details 
> [here|https://github.com/conda-forge/abseil-cpp-feedstock/issues/37].
> Relatedly, when I 
> [tried|https://github.com/conda-forge/abseil-cpp-feedstock/pull/25] to switch 
> abseil to a newer C++ version on windows, things apparently broke in arrow 
> CI. This is because the ABI of abseil is sensitive to the C++ standard that's 
> used to compile, and google only supports a homogeneous version to compile 
> all artefacts in a stack. This creates some friction with conda-forge (where 
> the compilers are generally much newer than what arrow might be willing to 
> impose). For now, things seems to have worked out with arrow 
> [specifying|https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/897a4c0ce73c3fe07872beee2c1d2128e44f6dd4/cpp/cmake_modules/SetupCxxFlags.cmake#L121-L124]
>  C\+\+11 while conda-forge moved to C\+\+17 - at least on unix, but windows 
> was not so lucky.
> Perhaps people would therefore also be interested in collaborating (or at 
> least commenting on) this 
> [issue|https://github.com/conda-forge/abseil-cpp-feedstock/issues/29], which 
> should permit more flexibility by being able to opt into given standard 
> versions also from conda-forge.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to