[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17568517#comment-17568517
 ] 

Carlos O'Ryan commented on ARROW-17110:
---------------------------------------

{quote}
AFAIU, the problem is that the GCS C++ headers use Abseil, so we depend on the 
ABI no matter what. [~coryan] Is my understanding right?
{quote}

That is correct, `google-cloud-cpp` uses Abseil in headers.

FWIW, gRPC now requires C++ >= 14:

https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/L98-requiring-cpp14.md
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.47.0

so does google-cloud-cpp:

https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-cpp/discussions/8740
https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-cpp/releases/tag/v2.0.0

I expect that Protobuf will follow suit sooner rather than later.

The following policy, while yet adopted by any of these projects, may be 
informational:

https://opensource.google/documentation/policies/cplusplus-support



> [C++] Move away from C++11
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-17110
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17110
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: H. Vetinari
>            Priority: Major
>
> The upcoming abseil release has dropped support for C++11, so 
> {_}eventually{_}, arrow will have to follow. More details 
> [here|https://github.com/conda-forge/abseil-cpp-feedstock/issues/37].
> Relatedly, when I 
> [tried|https://github.com/conda-forge/abseil-cpp-feedstock/pull/25] to switch 
> abseil to a newer C++ version on windows, things apparently broke in arrow 
> CI. This is because the ABI of abseil is sensitive to the C++ standard that's 
> used to compile, and google only supports a homogeneous version to compile 
> all artefacts in a stack. This creates some friction with conda-forge (where 
> the compilers are generally much newer than what arrow might be willing to 
> impose). For now, things seems to have worked out with arrow 
> [specifying|https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/897a4c0ce73c3fe07872beee2c1d2128e44f6dd4/cpp/cmake_modules/SetupCxxFlags.cmake#L121-L124]
>  C\+\+11 while conda-forge moved to C\+\+17 - at least on unix, but windows 
> was not so lucky.
> Perhaps people would therefore also be interested in collaborating (or at 
> least commenting on) this 
> [issue|https://github.com/conda-forge/abseil-cpp-feedstock/issues/29], which 
> should permit more flexibility by being able to opt into given standard 
> versions also from conda-forge.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to