dajac commented on code in PR #13240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13240#discussion_r1130670740


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/requests/OffsetCommitResponse.java:
##########
@@ -119,28 +131,52 @@ public boolean shouldClientThrottle(short version) {
         return version >= 4;
     }
 
+    public short version() {
+        return version;
+    }
+
     public static class Builder {
         OffsetCommitResponseData data = new OffsetCommitResponseData();
         HashMap<String, OffsetCommitResponseTopic> byTopicName = new 
HashMap<>();
+        private final TopicResolver topicResolver;
+        private final short version;
+
+        public Builder(TopicResolver topicResolver, short version) {

Review Comment:
   I actually wonder if we should do it the other way around. We could do 
KAFKA-14793 first, merge it, and update this one accordingly. Without 
KAFKA-14793, the contract of the not really respected and it feels a bit weird 
to work around it here instead of fixing the real issue. Is KAFKA-14793 
complicated? What do you think?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to