vamossagar12 commented on code in PR #13801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13801#discussion_r1238369128


##########
connect/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/storage/ConnectorOffsetBackingStore.java:
##########
@@ -279,10 +284,61 @@ public Future<Void> set(Map<ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer> 
values, Callback<Void> callb
             throw new IllegalStateException("At least one non-null offset 
store must be provided");
         }
 
+        boolean containsTombstones = values.containsValue(null);
+
+        // If there are tombstone offsets, then the failure to write to 
secondary store will
+        // not be ignored. Also, for tombstone records, we first write to 
secondary store and
+        // then to primary stores.
+        if (secondaryStore != null && containsTombstones) {
+            AtomicReference<Throwable> secondaryStoreTombstoneWriteError = new 
AtomicReference<>();
+            Future<Void> secondaryWriteFuture = secondaryStore.set(values, 
(secondaryWriteError, ignored) -> {
+                try (LoggingContext context = loggingContext()) {
+                    if (secondaryWriteError != null) {
+                        log.warn("Failed to write offsets with tombstone 
records to secondary backing store", secondaryWriteError);
+                        secondaryStoreTombstoneWriteError.compareAndSet(null, 
secondaryWriteError);
+                    } else {
+                        log.debug("Successfully flushed tombstone offsets to 
secondary backing store");
+                    }
+                }
+            });

Review Comment:
   I see what you are saying. I think what you mean is that the callback passed 
to the `set` method itself can be provided to the `KafkaOffsetBackingStore#set` 
method and it will take care of completing it when the `onComplete` of 
`SetCallback` is completed. I think that makes sense but the reason I did this 
was that I can't return the `Future<Void>` object created when invoking 
`KafkaOffsetBackingStore#set` object always because if that operation succeeds 
then we also need to write to the primary store. That's why, created this extra 
callback which gets executed upon `onComplete` of `SetCallback` and with this I 
can selectively return a `FutureCallBack<Void>` object by giving it the 
original callback. Let me know if that makes sense?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to