OmniaGM commented on code in PR #15597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15597#discussion_r1541293009


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/config/AbstractConfig.java:
##########
@@ -580,8 +601,15 @@ private Map<String, ConfigProvider> 
instantiateConfigProviders(Map<String, Strin
 
         for (String provider : configProviders.split(",")) {
             String providerClass = providerClassProperty(provider);
-            if (indirectConfigs.containsKey(providerClass))
-                providerMap.put(provider, indirectConfigs.get(providerClass));
+            if (indirectConfigs.containsKey(providerClass)) {
+                String providerClassName = indirectConfigs.get(providerClass);
+                if (classNameFilter.test(providerClassName)) {

Review Comment:
   small suggestion here instead of having 2 nested `if`s inside a `for` maybe 
we can something like this 
   ```
   Optional<String> providerClassName = 
Optional.ofNullable(indirectConfigs.get(providerClass));
   Boolean isAllowed = providerClassName.map(name -> 
classNameFilter.test(name)).orElse(false);
   
   
   
   
   
   if (isAllowed) {
       providerMap.put(provider, providerClassName.get());
   } else {
       throw new ConfigException(providerClassName + " is not allowed. Update 
System property '"
               + AUTOMATIC_CONFIG_PROVIDERS_PROPERTY + "' to allow " + 
providerClassName);
     }
     ```



##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/config/AbstractConfig.java:
##########
@@ -580,8 +601,15 @@ private Map<String, ConfigProvider> 
instantiateConfigProviders(Map<String, Strin
 
         for (String provider : configProviders.split(",")) {
             String providerClass = providerClassProperty(provider);
-            if (indirectConfigs.containsKey(providerClass))
-                providerMap.put(provider, indirectConfigs.get(providerClass));
+            if (indirectConfigs.containsKey(providerClass)) {
+                String providerClassName = indirectConfigs.get(providerClass);
+                if (classNameFilter.test(providerClassName)) {

Review Comment:
   small suggestion here instead of having 2 nested `if`s inside a `for` maybe 
we can something like this 
   ```
   Optional<String> providerClassName = 
Optional.ofNullable(indirectConfigs.get(providerClass));
   Boolean isAllowed = providerClassName.map(name -> 
classNameFilter.test(name)).orElse(false);
   if (isAllowed) {
       providerMap.put(provider, providerClassName.get());
   } else {
       throw new ConfigException(providerClassName + " is not allowed. Update 
System property '"
               + AUTOMATIC_CONFIG_PROVIDERS_PROPERTY + "' to allow " + 
providerClassName);
     }
     ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to