rreddy-22 commented on code in PR #17822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17822#discussion_r1843079795
##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/internals/TransactionManager.java:
##########
@@ -339,24 +338,21 @@ private TransactionalRequestResult
beginCompletingTransaction(TransactionResult
if (!newPartitionsInTransaction.isEmpty())
enqueueRequest(addPartitionsToTransactionHandler());
- // If the error is an INVALID_PRODUCER_ID_MAPPING error, the server
will not accept an EndTxnRequest, so skip
- // directly to InitProducerId. Otherwise, we must first abort the
transaction, because the producer will be
- // fenced if we directly call InitProducerId.
- if (!(lastError instanceof InvalidPidMappingException)) {
- EndTxnRequest.Builder builder = new EndTxnRequest.Builder(
- new EndTxnRequestData()
- .setTransactionalId(transactionalId)
- .setProducerId(producerIdAndEpoch.producerId)
- .setProducerEpoch(producerIdAndEpoch.epoch)
- .setCommitted(transactionResult.id),
- isTransactionV2Enabled
- );
+ // We must first abort the transaction, because the producer will be
Review Comment:
Oh yes, this was the existing comment and I just cut it down, was actually
discussing with Calvin that the wording was right! Thanks for pointing it out,
will change it!
##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/internals/TransactionManager.java:
##########
@@ -339,24 +338,21 @@ private TransactionalRequestResult
beginCompletingTransaction(TransactionResult
if (!newPartitionsInTransaction.isEmpty())
enqueueRequest(addPartitionsToTransactionHandler());
- // If the error is an INVALID_PRODUCER_ID_MAPPING error, the server
will not accept an EndTxnRequest, so skip
- // directly to InitProducerId. Otherwise, we must first abort the
transaction, because the producer will be
- // fenced if we directly call InitProducerId.
- if (!(lastError instanceof InvalidPidMappingException)) {
- EndTxnRequest.Builder builder = new EndTxnRequest.Builder(
- new EndTxnRequestData()
- .setTransactionalId(transactionalId)
- .setProducerId(producerIdAndEpoch.producerId)
- .setProducerEpoch(producerIdAndEpoch.epoch)
- .setCommitted(transactionResult.id),
- isTransactionV2Enabled
- );
+ // We must first abort the transaction, because the producer will be
Review Comment:
Oh yes, this was the existing comment and I just cut it down, was actually
discussing with Calvin that the wording wasn't right earlier! Thanks for
pointing it out, will change it!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
