artemlivshits commented on code in PR #19163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19163#discussion_r1985871102
##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/requests/AbstractRequest.java:
##########
@@ -122,8 +124,8 @@ public final ByteBuffer serializeWithHeader(RequestHeader
header) {
}
// Visible for testing
- public final ByteBuffer serialize() {
- return MessageUtil.toByteBuffer(data(), version);
+ public final Readable serialize() {
Review Comment:
Maybe just return `ByteAccessor`?
##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/protocol/MessageUtil.java:
##########
@@ -204,13 +204,17 @@ public static boolean
compareRawTaggedFields(List<RawTaggedField> first,
}
}
- public static ByteBuffer toByteBuffer(final Message message, final short
version) {
+ public static Readable toReadable(final Message message, final short
version) {
ObjectSerializationCache cache = new ObjectSerializationCache();
int messageSize = message.size(cache, version);
ByteBufferAccessor bytes = new
ByteBufferAccessor(ByteBuffer.allocate(messageSize));
message.write(bytes, cache, version);
bytes.flip();
- return bytes.buffer();
+ return bytes;
+ }
+
+ public static ByteBuffer toByteBuffer(final Message message, final short
version) {
+ return ((ByteBufferAccessor) toReadable(message, version)).buffer();
Review Comment:
I agree, we could probably just have `ByteAccessor toByteAcessor(final
Message message, final short version)` either as a single method to be used for
both variants or as a private method with 2 public wrappers `toReadable` and
`toByteBuffer`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
