jolshan commented on code in PR #17022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17022#discussion_r2138447310


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/internals/TransactionManager.java:
##########
@@ -779,14 +779,25 @@ public synchronized void 
maybeTransitionToErrorState(RuntimeException exception)
     }
 
     synchronized void handleFailedBatch(ProducerBatch batch, RuntimeException 
exception, boolean adjustSequenceNumbers) {
-        maybeTransitionToErrorState(exception);
+        // Compare the batch with the current ProducerIdAndEpoch. If the 
producer IDs are the *same* but the epochs
+        // are *different*, consider the batch as stale.
+        boolean isStaleBatch = batch.producerId() == 
producerIdAndEpoch.producerId && batch.producerEpoch() != 
producerIdAndEpoch.epoch;

Review Comment:
   Ok. So I suppose this was being check somewhere else 😅 I suppose we can 
revert that. 
   Perhaps it is sufficient to still fail in the edge case where we have epoch 
overflow for now as it doesn't seem like we will make much progress on finding 
an alternative.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to