majialoong commented on code in PR #20638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20638#discussion_r2485286304


##########
tools/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/tools/ConnectPluginPath.java:
##########
@@ -192,6 +200,21 @@ private static Set<Path> parseLocations(ArgumentParser 
parser, Namespace namespa
         return pluginLocations;
     }
 
+    private static void validatePluginPath(String pluginPath, String 
configName) throws ConfigException {
+        String trimmed = pluginPath.trim();
+        if (trimmed.isEmpty()) {
+            throw new ConfigException("'" + configName + "' must not be 
empty.");
+        }
+
+        String[] pluginPathElements = COMMA_WITH_WHITESPACE.split(trimmed, -1);
+
+        for (String path : pluginPathElements) {

Review Comment:
   Thanks for your review. In the current `WorkerConfig`, the `plugin.path` 
config is defined as not allowing empty values. 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/8900a1870354755283a5ed610e0b1420eca5e912/connect/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/runtime/WorkerConfig.java#L227-L232
   
   In `ValidList#ensureValid`, it first validates whether the value itself is 
empty. 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/8900a1870354755283a5ed610e0b1420eca5e912/clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/config/ConfigDef.java#L1043-L1047
   
   Then it validates whether each individual item is empty through the 
`validateIndividualValues` method. 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/8900a1870354755283a5ed610e0b1420eca5e912/clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/config/ConfigDef.java#L1059-L1069
   
   So, I think the validation logic here is consistent with the validation 
logic in the current configuration. You can take another look if you have time. 
Thanks! 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to