ableegoldman commented on a change in pull request #10512:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10512#discussion_r610942845



##########
File path: docs/upgrade.html
##########
@@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ <h5><a id="upgrade_300_notable" 
href="#upgrade_300_notable">Notable changes in 3
             were removed. These methods were not intended to be public API and 
there is no replacement.</li>
         <li>The <code>NoOffsetForPartitionException.partition()</code> method 
was removed. Please use <code>partitions()</code>
             instead.</li>
-        <li>The Scala <code>kafka.common.MessageFormatter</code> was removed. 
Plese use the Java <code>org.apache.kafka.common.MessageFormatter</code>.</li>
+        <li>The Scala <code>kafka.common.MessageFormatter</code> was removed. 
Please use the Java <code>org.apache.kafka.common.MessageFormatter</code>.</li>
         <li>The <code>MessageFormatter.init(Properties)</code> method was 
removed. Please use <code>configure(Map)</code> instead.</li>
+        <li>The <code>PartitionAssignor</code> classes have been removed. 
Please use <code>ConsumerPartitionAssignor</code> instead.</li>

Review comment:
       I changed it to the singular `class` intentionally since the 
`PartitionAssignorAdaptor` was never a public API, the only thing that was 
exposed to users -- and therefore the only thing they care or need to know 
about -- was the `PartitionAssignor`. Does that make sense?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to