[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17402997#comment-17402997 ]
Bruno Cadonna commented on KAFKA-12766: --------------------------------------- Hi [~TomerWizman]! Thank you for your interest! Since Streams disables the WAL and it will also log a warn message that the WAL is disabled and the WAL-related options are ignored, I would say that it shouldn't be too unexpected for users not getting the set WAL-related options. I would keep it simple and just ignore the set WAL-related options and state in the warn log message that they were ignored. Looking forward to your PR! > Consider Disabling WAL-related Options in RocksDB > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KAFKA-12766 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12766 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: streams > Reporter: Bruno Cadonna > Assignee: Tomer Wizman > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie, newbie++ > Fix For: 3.1.0 > > > Streams disables the write-ahead log (WAL) provided by RocksDB since it > replicates the data in changelog topics. Hence, it does not make much sense > to set WAL-related configs for RocksDB instances within Streams. > Streams could: > - disable WAL-related options > - ignore WAL-related options > - throw an exception when a WAL-related option is set. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)