Hi Im not sure what you mean? Random actions do get selected (under simple controller). if your simple controller had 250 requests then you would get 5 at random (though the original posted stated that he didnt want those 250 requests as samples)
regards deepak On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Adrian Speteanu <asp.ad...@gmail.com>wrote: > True, that works for me as well. > But the point was to select random actions each loop, so it's the > random controller at stake here. > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Deepak Shetty<shet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > this works as expected for me > > Thread Group 1 (1 thread 1 Loop) > > Loop Controller ( 5) > > Module Controller ---> Thread Group 2 -->Recording --> Simple > > > > Thread Group 2 (Disabled) > > Recording Controller > > Simple Controller > > Req 1 > > Req 2 > > > > Result = 5 requests (Req1,Req2,Req2,Req2,Req1) > > > > regards > > deepak > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Adrian Speteanu <asp.ad...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> I changed the previous test plan for case 4, i forgot to change one > >> little detail. > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Adrian Speteanu<asp.ad...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > case 3: > >> > - random controller directly in disabled thread group (module > >> > controller referencing it) : number of results is twice as much as > >> > expected (for 5 loops, 10 results). this time the samples aren't > >> > randomised any more (just like they are in a simple controller) > >> > > >> > case 4: > >> > - random controller directly in the thread group with the loop > >> > Thread Group 1 (1 thread 1 loop) > >> > +loop controller (5 times) > >> > \- module controller that refferences to the random controller > bellow > >> > +random controller > >> > Expected 5+2, results tree shows 11 samples - this is the weirdest and > >> > it happens the same each time I try it. > >> > > >> > well at least the numbers are predictable, this way one can anticipate > >> > the loops number really required in order to get the expected results > >> > :). > >> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Deepak Shetty<shet...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> One last thing , move the recording controller to its own disabled > >> Thread > >> >> Group > >> >> Thread Group 1 (1 thread 1 loop) > >> >>> +loop controller (5 times) > >> >>> \- module controller that refferences to the group2/simple > controller > >> >> bellow > >> >> > >> >> Thread Group 2 (Disabled) > >> >>> +recording controller > >> >>> simple Controller > >> >>> \- random controller (under which samples are recorded with the > proxy > >> >>> server) > >> >>> \- http sampler 1 > >> >>> \- http sampler 2 > >> >> > >> >> regards > >> >> deepak > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Adrian Speteanu < > asp.ad...@gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Still not working right, however I got it a little wrong about the > >> >>> number of results: > >> >>> > >> >>> case 1: > >> >>> - random controller is directly in the recording controller: for 5 > >> >>> loops, I get 15 results (not 10 as mentioned in previous mail). > >> >>> > >> >>> case 2 > >> >>> - deepak's recommendation, random controller in simple controller: > the > >> >>> number of results is higher with one than expected, but still not > >> >>> right. > >> >>> > >> >>> weird, isn't it? > >> >>> > >> >>> [test environment] > >> >>> xp pro > >> >>> jre 6 update 7 > >> >>> jmeter 2.3.4 > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Deepak Shetty<shet...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > Can you retest with ading a simple controller as the parent of the > >> random > >> >>> > and point your module controller to it? im not sure if the module > >> >>> controller > >> >>> > includes all the children under it or includes the parent as > well.. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > +loop controller (5 times) > >> >>> > \- module controller that refferences to the simple controller > >> bellow > >> >>> > +recording controller > >> >>> > simple Controller > >> >>> > \- random controller (under which samples are recorded with the > >> proxy > >> >>> > server) > >> >>> > \- http sampler 1 > >> >>> > \- http sampler 2 > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Speteanu < > >> asp.ad...@gmail.com > >> >>> >wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> Hi guys, I was experimenting with an idea that doesn't require > >> coding > >> >>> >> and found a little bug: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Make a test plan like this > >> >>> >> thread group (threads = 1, ramp = 1, loops = 1) > >> >>> >> +loop controller (5 times) > >> >>> >> \- module controller that refferences to the random controller > >> bellow > >> >>> >> +recording controller > >> >>> >> \- random controller (under which samples are recorded with the > >> proxy > >> >>> >> server) > >> >>> >> \- http sampler 1 > >> >>> >> \- http sampler 2 > >> >>> >> +results tree > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> the actual results of this running with one thread was 10 samples > in > >> >>> >> the results tree. it looks like the random controller acted like > a > >> >>> >> random order controller in this case. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> the same issue occurs if the module controller is directly in the > >> >>> >> thread group and the loops = 5. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> same happens to you? (couldn't found a known bug in bugzilla > >> searching > >> >>> >> for random controller) > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Deepak Shetty<shet...@gmail.com > > > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> >> > Hi > >> >>> >> > you could do this with BSH, You'd have to write some java code > >> that > >> >>> can > >> >>> >> get > >> >>> >> > 6 strings from 250 randomly from a file and set those as > variables > >> >>> that > >> >>> >> can > >> >>> >> > be iterated over(using forEach , your variables would have the > >> names > >> >>> like > >> >>> >> > url_1 , url_2 and the foreach would iterate over url , you'd > just > >> need > >> >>> >> one > >> >>> >> > sampler). You can tweak the BSH to do whatever you want (i.e. > vary > >> the > >> >>> >> total > >> >>> >> > number or read a single value randomly) > >> >>> >> > regards > >> >>> >> > deepak > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:49 AM, E. Doherty < > dohert...@gmail.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> >> Greetings! I'm new to JMeter, and I'm trying to replicate > >> something > >> >>> >> >> that was easy to do back in my LoadRunner days. > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> For "background" activity when testing specific things, I > would > >> >>> create > >> >>> >> >> a LoadRunner script in which a Vuser viewed, say, six > different > >> >>> pages. > >> >>> >> >> I would then parameterize the six URLs, and on each > occurrence a > >> URL > >> >>> >> >> would be chosen randomly from a file that contained the 250 > most > >> >>> >> >> popular URLs on the site. > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> In JMeter, I could use a ramdom controller with 250 samplers > (one > >> for > >> >>> >> >> each URL) under it, and loop through ten times, but the 250 > >> samplers > >> >>> >> >> seems too unwieldy. Better, I could have six samplers, and (I > >> think) > >> >>> >> >> use the StringFromFile function to grab a URL on each > occurrence > >> - > >> >>> >> >> however, StringFromFile reads lines from a file sequentially. > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> Is there a relatively efficient way to perform the URL > >> ramdomization > >> >>> >> >> I'd like, without having huge numbers of samplers or multiple > >> data > >> >>> >> >> files? > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> Thank you for any suggestions! > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >
