The nice thing is that now a charge of -3 or -4 should retrieve the same number. Problem averted!
Phillip Barak wrote: >>From: Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>I made a note that I'm suspicious of "Sn-4". I think there is no >>"Sn-4" >>-- One reference I have lists the value shown for "Sn-3", although >>this >>must be very rare -- tin is usually +2 or +4. Perhaps someone can >>look >>that up for us? >> >> > >I can confirm that the table of crystal ionic radii in the Handbook of >Chemistry and Physics, 48th edn (that's what I had handy when I was >preparing the table/file, back when) has entries for Sn -4 and Sn-1, as >well as Sn2+ and Sn4+. The tables of Shannon and Prewitt (1969) and >Whittaker and Muntus (1970) have only the +2 and +4 states for Sn. Then >again, they don't have values that would cover Sn2H6. I'd suggest just >leaving it as is. > >--Phillip Barak > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash >http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-developers mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
