RasMol 2.6 is not the current version, and it is not very productive
to work from that as a base, nor does it make sense to drop back
and fix problems in such an old version.  The best current release
is RasMol 2.7.2.1.  I am working on a final clean up to 2.7.2 that
will be released shortly as 2.7.2.1.1.  Then I will incorporate
the next round of improvements into 2.7.3.  If there is a problem
with axis labelling, I will be happy to fix it in 2.7.3, but first
we need to know for sure what we want to do.  I believe most users
are used to the coordinate system in the manual in which the Y
axis goes down and the X axis run to the right.  Is there some
disagreement about that?
  -- Herbert
=====================================================
 Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
   Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
        Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769

                 +1-631-244-3035
                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====================================================

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Miguel Howard wrote:

> Herbert said:
>
> > To help get us all on the same page, I have prepared a draft
> > positioning test at:
> >
> >   http://arcib.dowling.edu/~BernsteH/postest/
> >
> > I will run rasmol for a variety of platforms (including sgi, mac and
> > windows )through this test later today and see if we have gotten
> > turned around on any of them.
>
> Thanks for posting this. It is helpful.
>
> There were several follow-up messages about this on jmol-users, and you may
> not have been copied on some critical ones.
>
> I believe that the general concensus is that the confusion is caused by
> a labelling error in RasWin (and possibly some older versions of RasMol).
>
> Jan says that RasWin puts the Y label at the *top* of the axis, which
> is actually the negative end.
>
> Nevertheless, the coordinate system *is* right-handed ... it was only a
> labelling issue.
>
> Jan also says that this problem does not exist in RasMol 2.7
>
>
> > In any case it is the intention,
> > as stated in the manual for y to be increasing going down and x
> > to be increasing going to the right.
>
> This was actually the genesis of the discussion on jmol-users ... the fact
> that the +Y axis goes down.
>
> The axis orientation discussion was a prelude to the *real* discussion
> that we need to have about the rotations in RasMol.
>
>
> Miguel
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------rasmol-+
>
> To change your address, unsubscribe, view previous messages/history,
> receive messages as weekly digests, or for any other information
> about the RasMol EMail List, please go to
>         http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/raslist.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------rasmol--
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to