Herbert,

> RasMol 2.6 is not the current version, and it is not very productive to
> work from that as a base,

In general I agree that people should use the current version of OpenRasMol.

However, in my particular case I have two special reasons for running 2.6:
  1. My primary motivation for working on Jmol is to build
     a Chime replacement. Since 2.6 was the basis for Chime,
     I think it makes sense for me to use it.
  2. I have recently had the need to look at the source code
     in order to understand the rules for hydrogen bonding.
     Since the 2.6 source code is in the public domain, I
     can read the source code without infringing upon any
     licensing issues.

I am not doing any real *work* with RasMol :-)


> nor does it make sense to drop back
> and fix problems in such an old version.

I agree.

> The best current release is
> RasMol 2.7.2.1.  I am working on a final clean up to 2.7.2 that will be
> released shortly as 2.7.2.1.1.  Then I will incorporate
> the next round of improvements into 2.7.3.  If there is a problem
> with axis labelling, I will be happy to fix it in 2.7.3, but first we
> need to know for sure what we want to do.

Jan indicated that the labelling was *not* an issue in 2.7.? on Irix.

He indicated that the Y axes labelling was a problem with RasWin. He did
not say which version.

(For my part, I don't understand the RasMol lineage/progeny well enough to
know where RasWin fits in relative to RasMol 2.6 or 2.7 :-)


> I believe most users are used
> to the coordinate system in the manual in which the Y
> axis goes down and the X axis run to the right.  Is there some
> disagreement about that?

I will address this in a separate email.



Miguel





-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to