This is fixed in Jmol 11.1.22.

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:02:21 -0400
From: Frieda Reichsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Subject: [Jmol-users] isosurfaces and the new translucency
To: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
Message-ID: < [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I'm enjoying the beauty of the new translucency with surfaces. But I
find that In Jmol 11.1.21 , using the command

isosurface mysurface translucent on

the 'on' throws an error - invalid argument. Probably wants a number
for translucency, right?

But, in Jmol 11.1.18, the 'on' is required to show a surface (loaded
mysurface with a jvxl file) -- if I leave off the 'on' the command is
ineffective - no surface appears. So maybe a backward compatibility
issue?

The inconsistency between Jmol versions is the same using:

isosurface mysurface opaque on

Frieda

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to