Quick follow up to http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/local/organic/pericyclic/2HK4.html
Kinemage (which is more veritable than Jmol), also fails to close the cycle on cyclic DNA, so I presume that Jmol is merely following the convention in this regard in how it also does this. I guess this is a bit of disconnect between molecular biologists, who care less about "covalent bonds", and chemists, who do care! Or have they all simply missed a trick with this one? -- Henry Rzepa. +44 (020) 7594 5774 (Voice); http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/rzepa.xrdf (FOAF) http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/ Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK. (Voracious anti-spam filter in operation for received email. If expected reply not received, please phone/fax). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
