>Henry, I've devised a (very) dirty solution: >duplicate residue 1 as nr. 9 > >The trace or cartoon is very sharp at the connection,
agreed > so things get >better if we shift the residue numbering, such as making >1 -> 6 >2 -> 7 >3 -> 8 >4 -> 1 >5 -> 2 >6 -> 3 >7 -> 4 >8 -> 5 >9 is a copy of the new residue 1 (former 6); this is in the >straightest part of the chain, so the conection looks better. > Not easy to code in a general sense! Perhaps that is why no-one has tried to! Thanks again. -- Henry Rzepa. +44 (020) 7594 5774 (Voice); http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/rzepa.xrdf (FOAF) http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/ Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK. (Voracious anti-spam filter in operation for received email. If expected reply not received, please phone/fax). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
