I have mixed feelings about this, hesitating between two options :
- As Angel said, keeping the monolithic applet big can help force people
to move to the split applet.
- Modifying the way the monolithic applet works by removing the
translations from it, but allowing to have translations in separate jar
files (as for the split applet)
Nico
2010/6/2 Angel Herráez <angel.herr...@uah.es>
> My opinion:
>
> 1. I agree that we must stress the recommendation to use the split applet
> files. I'll take a look
> at the Wiki page to reinforce this.
>
> 2. I don't agree about removing the translations from the monolithic
> applet. If someone
> decides to use it for some reason (e.g. for local testing without having to
> drag around the
> whole bunch of files, as I did once recently), the translation would be
> desirable. And having a
> big applet is perhaps the strongest reason to convince people to stop using
> it and favor the
> split version!
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
