Hi,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Robert Hanson" <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. August 2010 14:48:50
> Betreff: Re: [Jmol-users] change the visible part of an isosurface without
> reloading
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Alexander Rose <
> [email protected] > wrote:
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It seems though that the last command does not work on an existing
> > map:
>
> > isosurface ID "foo" within 2.0 {atomNo<100} # doesn't work
>
>
>
> That's right. The WITHIN option is only for map creation, not map
> display.
>
> It's certainly an interesting idea, though. Sort of a "hide selected
> triangles" option, I think. Hmm. We have:
>
> isosurface ID "foo" show
> isosurface ID "foo" hide
>
isn't that at the moment:
isosurface ID "foo" on
isosurface ID "foo" off
isosurface ID "foo" hide # works
isosurface ID "foo" show # does not work
> maybe
>
> isosurface ID "foo" show within 2.0 {atomset}
> isosurface ID "foo" show all
>
> ?
the syntax is fine, thou it would be nice if the command would also accept
points in addition to atomsets
this then defines a new post-load 'within' syntax in addition to the on-load
within command. the question is, if it is necessary to distinguish that much
between them or if a unification would make it clearer. hmm, one could expect
the post-load 'within' to show parts he hadn't loaded with the on-load
'within'. So, I think an extra command is better, as you suggested.
Alex
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
