On 31 May 2013, at 14:45, Angel Herráez <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> You just flip the switch in Info from use:"Java" to use:"HTML5". > > I don't think so. The existing information for Wikis will use either > Jmol.js Yes, and a custom extension for Mediawiki. > or, most likely, wiki-engine-specific extensions that > implement Jmol applets. > So, description(s) for the new Jmol-JSO method (either Java or HTML5 > JSmol) are relevant and will be welcome. > > Henry, I think there has been one or two threads recently regarding > JSmol in one of the wiki engines. I will point you to them if I can > locate them. > Apart from that, there is the Proteopedia experience (using > Mediawiki). I know they have implemented JSmol (and it will be used > by default in some non-Java platforms, but I don't know the details). > Last time I looked there was a link to a page that explains the > implementation, but the page did not exist yet. Please check the wiki > section on "Literature" and you will see the article where the link > is provided (2013 in the Israel J Chem). Otherwise, Jaime Prilusky or > his colleagues may provide guidance. > Jaime and others: is there a succinct page describing how to install/configure it into MediaWiki? I ask because I am occasionally asked (and the next occasion will be June 6th) to talk to audience about our experiences with Wikis, and I invariably show them Jmol (as something really quite different from what most people expect). So now that I have mastered the art of projecting eg an iPad to an audience, it would be nice to show Wiki/JSmol on that device! > > As always, contributions to the Jmol Wiki by any Jmol user will be > welcome and appreciated. > It's sad to say, statistics show > 6.221 page edits since installing the wiki, of which 4.317 are by me > in the last 3 months > 5.026 users, of which just 22 are "active" (i.e. with some activity > in the last 3 months) --we do have a lot of junk users (spammers > without success) that should not count. > > I'm happy to contribute on this --others are doing a greater job in > other areas like coding--, but I may get tired any day... ;-) > and J(S)mol is getting really complex :) Yes, as software systems go it is about as sophisticated (and hence complex) as it gets. Wonderful of course but it can take a little time to get the best out of it! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
