That's fair enough. Thanks for clarifying the situation.
Cheers Simon Quoting Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu>: > The difference is that the mmCIF reader was split off from the CIF reader. > In the past, the CIF reader included all the macromolecule code, and > somewhere along the way of reading it all Jmol determined that it was mmCIF > and not CIF. That is a difference recently introduced. Actually it doesn't > matter if a normal CIF file is read as mmCIF -- it just isn't efficient in > reading code; but as you see, if there is no marker now for mmCIF, the > structure will be read fine as CIF and then not be able to use its > secondary structure, biomolecules, etc. > ? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
