Bob,
They know it! They are the ones who pointed this out to me after my
conventional JSON extraction failed on some compounds. They explained the
necessity of this type of loop to me:
var p = data.PC_Compounds[0].props;
pubCid = data.PC_Compounds[0].id.id.cid;
for (var i = 0; i < p.length; i++) {
if (p[i].urn.label == "SMILES" && p[i].urn.name == "Isomeric")
{pubSmi = p[i].value.sval;}
if (p[i].urn.label == "InChI" && p[i].urn.name == "Standard")
{pubInchi = p[i].value.sval;}
if (p[i].urn.label == "InChIKey" && p[i].urn.name ==
"Standard") {pubInchiKey = p[i].value.sval;}
if (p[i].urn.label == "IUPAC Name" && p[i].urn.name ==
"Systematic") {pubName = p[i].value.sval;}
}
I definitely got the impression that the compound to compound variation was by
design. If not by design, then it must be related to the evolution of their
system. Either way, they definitely know about it.
Otis
--
Otis Rothenberger
o...@chemagic.org
http://chemagic.org
> On May 9, 2016, at 7:16 PM, Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu> wrote:
>
> Then you should contact PubChem and get them to fix that.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
