Hello Bruce I will gladly take a look at your page when I have time, but here are a few comments in advance:
1. Using JSmol-html5 with IE is very slow, indeed. Other browsers are recommendable. 2. Given the current state of Java support, you'd better forget chances of using Jmol-Java. I agree that it is an advantage for large models or, as in your case, isosurface computations. But we are loosing that battle. Firefox just dropped support for plugins, as Chrome did before. I am switching to PaleMoon as my main browser (they will support plugins indefinitely), but Oracle will eventually abandon the offering of the Java plugin. 3. What you might try to do is to save the isosufaces to a file. Loading them later is very fast. I have not a clear idea to what extent your calculation is unique or can be done in advance and the result used repeatedly. 4. If you have the control and expertise, you culd run the calculation in the server (using Jmol.jar or the JmolData.jar that does not use graphics), save the file and then serve it to the client browser. That would be faster, running in Java and not in JSmol-html5. 5. Although you are fine with JSmol.min.js + Jmol2.js, if it safer to move to direct implementation without Jmol2.js. Probably this has no effect on performance, though, but it safer for the future. I would not think you are doing anything wrong, you are just hitting the inherent speed limitations of JSmol. More later, I hope. --- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
