09/29/2005 08:18 AM 1,813,012 ch3cl-density.cub
09/17/2006 07:47 AM 600,830 ch3cl-density.cub.gz
06/08/2017 08:39 AM 4,631 ch3cl-density.jvxl
06/08/2017 08:40 AM 2,928 ch3cl-density.jvxl.gz
So that is 390:1 with just the JVXL, or 619:1 compression using JVXL+GZ.
(There is never a need to use GZ for web-based files; they almost certainly
will be automatically gzipped by the server anyway.)
So I can't say I'm super impressed. If it's truly full volume data, that
would be impressive.
Bob
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Rzepa, Henry S <h.rz...@imperial.ac.uk>
wrote:
>
> > On 8 Jun 2017, at 13:45, Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu> wrote:
> >
> > ps -- neither of the VMD images at http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/
> rzepa/blog/?p=18365#comment-243964 are volume rendering, by the way. They
> are just surfaces, one with reflection; one just a mesh. Right?
>
> Yes. The reduction in cube size of ~500 is impressive, but then JVXL
> manages ~100 (and perhaps more if compressed?)
>
> Contact Brian Skinner for the inside story. bsk...@alum.mit.edu
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
