On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:33:51 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Agree with Kevin. To minimize risk, especially since this is to fix a >> significant regression and we are in RDP1, we are really trying to preserve >> the existing code as much as possible, even though it could be improved. > > It is also more error prone (which is why I suggested using a single well > tested utility method to implement the temporary hackery rather than > spreading it at different places in different forms). But I'm OK with the > code in this form. Thanks Daniel! ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19624#discussion_r1644374757
