First, the statement in the letter I forwarded about the facts being not
slanted was from the author.
It seems to me what Azeem, Paul and Vince are talking about is that the
CHOICE of facts is in itself a slanting of the truth.
Sure anybody can choose to present the facts they want to defend their cause,
so what?
The question is then: are the facts true and do they shed some light on what's
going on.
I believe there is so much bias is the media against Israel that presenting
these facts might help some of you become more informed. Period.
Azeem wrote: "there is one howler so obvious it should be easily spottable,
and if nothing else give pause for thought about the others" Could you
please be specific?
If you can't and as you say yourself you don't wish to analyze every statement
and you're no expert then why make this kind of accusation about the validity
of the entire list of facts without even saying what you're referring to?
Laurent
