Hi Walt,

Thanks for the interest in Joni's paintings.  I majored in painting and
earned a master's degree. What I learned about painting then could fill
a thimble. The same frustrations Joni had in art school was shared by so
many of us. We were eager to learn, but sold short by a well intended
movement. -So much for good intentions. Modern art was the death knell
of art instruction. Thankfully, the tide is turning. I'm learning to
paint. Joni's learning to paint. I just hope I don't have to learn to
compose music. Please, Joni. Please. 3 more cd's on the level of Hejira
is all I ask. Now is that too much? I think not.

Somewhere in the 13th century, Artist nailed down the principles of
painting form (the illusion of 3 dimensional mass and volume). The
strongest way to convey volume is rendering the effects of light and
shadow on forms. It's the value diffences of light reflected off forms
that create the illusion.  Drawing this was easy. Painting it another
thing. What solved the problem was figuring out how to degrees of light
and dark (in color) as one would drawing it in black and white. The
solution artists arrived at was pre-mixing values of color. Egg tempera
was the general method of painting back then. Egg yolk, water and
powdered pigment equalled paint. The problem with this paint is it dries
too fast to blend colors. The solution artists arrived at was pre-mixing
values of color from light to dark. Having the spectrum of color value
to work from, it was 'just' a matter of laying the right values of color
next to each other.

When oil painting was invented, the artist still applied the old
technique of pre-mixing color values ahead of time. So in a sense,
Rembrandt, Vermeer, Titian, Raphael all painted by numbers. Make a scale
of light to dark in black and white, then mix colors of equal values
from light to dark. Substitute the proper hues for the underpainting of
proper values, and boom: form. The more accurate the color values, the
more 'real' the illusion of form. -Beginning with the impressionists,
the idea of preset mixes of color was replaced by 'open' palettes.
Colors squished out of the tube and freely intermixed. The made for
great "hue" painting. In time, the lesson of color value became more and
more 'lost.'
An in turn, form becomes more and more flat. With all the colors
squeezed out and freely mixed, the average person would look at this
pretty collection  of hues and think that making painting was about
getting the 'color' right, when they should be thinking about getting
both the hue and value right.

Joni is on the cusp of understanding this. If she's squinting, she's
squinting to see value, not color. Color is gauged with eyes wide open.
Value is better seen by squinting to eliminate some of the saturation of
hue... make it appear greyer, so to speak.

Grey scales held up to the object, and placed underneath the glass of
the paint palette is the ultimate tool for form painting. -In comparison
to the impressionists way, it can seem dry. It depends on what you want
your painting to look like. Going for a Matisse look, open palette. But
if you want the work to look like Vermeer, Sargent, or Norman Rockwell,
it's time to think values. I think Joni is looking for a happy medium
between the two. She wants the freedom, but craves the form as well.
Part of her duality, I think.

Sorry to all for the art lesson.

John.

Reply via email to