While I will admit to loving Graham(and agreeing with Nash's quotes in
Military Madness), I do not think that loving an artist requires me to agree
blindly with everything that artist says or writes or thinks.
For one thing, an artist's viewpoint can and does change throughout his/her
life.
For another thing, I think that interpreting everything an artist writes as
the sole reflection of that artist's perspective rather than an artistic
articulation of a thought or point of view, trivializes or marginalizes the
talent of the artist.
Should I still "Love the one I'm with" or never listen to Stills again?  Do I
have to become Muslim to listen to "Morning has broken"? Can I eat meat or
wear leather shoes and still listen to "All we are saying is give peace a
chance"?
Must I refuse to listen to Elvis Presley because of his drug problems or
because he admired Nixon?
I absolutely LOVE John Mellencamp, but have heard he is a real SOB to work
with; must I throw out all my Mellencamp cds?
Artists open our eyes, make us ask questions, show us injustices, broaden our
outlooks, BUT,
at least in my opinion,should not preach to us, ask for blind faith, or reject
our views when and if those views differ from their own views.
I highly respect Jackson Browne, love everything he has written, have had
several great conversations with him, BUT I would never vote for Nader for
president, nor does Jackson look down on me for voicing my opinion and voting
for some one else.
I would and do expect that same courtesy from the people who listen to Dylan,
Baez, Joni, Young, Joplin,Crosby, Bruce, Melissa, and others.
Darice


Reply via email to