(TIP: when contemplating along with > other "posters" other potential artists having created "three in a > row" ground-breaking, poetically profound, "filler-free" CDs in a > row; do not, I repeat, do not recommend L.A. Cowboy > http:www.mp3.lacowboy.com under any circumstances: or, word to the > wise, do so at your own risk - as it seems to noticeably irritate a > certain "poster" here for inexplicable reasons, as said "poster" has > confessed a lack of exposure and/or interest in above-stated artist's > music anyway!????) > >
If you're referring to me I never once said I was irritated and there was nothing in any of my posts to indicate I was irritated. I made it clear in the beginning that my post was not about the LA Cowboy but about the statement that was made and it was a purely intellectual question in the spirit of debate, out of curiosity more than anything else. As for whether or not I am interested in LA Cowboy's music, I have no idea at this time and quite honestly, have neither the time, the energy, or the money to even worry about it right now. I have my hands quite full, and most likely, will not even be able to pick up "Travelogue" tomorrow. What I do find irritating is the assumption that just because I have not expressed an interest in someone, one way or the other, I somehow "don't like" them or am being critical of them just because I'm not immediately jumping at the opportunity to listen to their music. Being a virtually unknown artist, I know very well about trying to get people to listen to new music and how difficult it can be. I actually appreciate the fact that you are so enthusiastic about this artist. However, you have to allow people a chance to take the initiative to discover someone's music. Just because they don't respond right away does not mean they won't in the future. Have a little patience. I have also found in most cases, the best impression is made when you see someone perform live. Victor, back from Atlanta
