Hmmm, my cynical, non-professional response would be to answer along the lines of b) and d). My semi-professional response would be to ask why no one advised that the artist needed to get clearances to use the voices. Don't know how the law works in Spain, but in the U.S. there is (in simplistic terms) the thought that if you let one get away with infringment, then eventually many/all will be infringed. How would you feel if say, Woody Allen, used dubbed your voice in one of his movies? If I ask myself the same question, I probably wouldn't like someone using my recorded voice without my permission, but I don't know that I would want to bother with a lawsuit, either. Perhaps, however, whatever agency represented the plaintiffs, wants to bring the suit and it may not have been originated by the actual plaintiffs.
Kakki Mike asked: > Are these plaintiffs a) bravely standing up against piracy, b) greedy > bastards, c) dickheads who can't take a joke or d) unwitting victims of > voracious lawyers who are desperate to get every penny out of a recording > session that took place 7 years ago.
