> Not to say that the discussion wasn't interesting
but all anyone offer as to the truth of the
proposition is how it seems to them by encountering
people in here, and that does not make a valid
foundation for conjecture.>

...Which is precisely what the conversation was about.
No one was saying they knew the truth or had all the
answers. In fact, I made it clear that it was just for
the sake of discussion, and it was a fun discussion at
that. 

And all this talk about JC and NJC...I really don't
understand what all the fuss is about, frankly, and
I'm an NJC subscriber. I delete about 30% of the posts
that ARE about Joni because I don't enjoy the
particular subject. Are we going to segregate
ourselves into little sealed off corners of the list
and filter out ideas we don't want to hear about,
endlessly labelling and categorizing? "Oh, sorry I
belong to the Court & Spark Only list" -"Well I belong
to the 'Hejira/Travelogue version' digest. Please
refrain from posting about the original Hejira. It
really makes me mad."

I thought such histrionics were reserved for acting
school flunkees.

I don't know about the rest of you but living in a
vacuum is too grey and dusty for my liking. If you
don't like it, delete it. The sun will rise the next
day. Life will go on. And your finger may benefit from
the exercise.

Sorry I'm being a bitch. But I am. (At least tonight)

-Andrew
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Reply via email to