I took Garret to mean that getters start with "get" and should not be
part of the regexp replacement, not exposed to the uppercasing. Same for
setters of course.
We might address this some time soon:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/2924
I would even go so far as to consider it bugs that the strategies
require that "get" and "set" be provided in the output of
<fieldSetter> and <fieldGetter>; and that the transform is applied
to the "get" and "set" suffixes as well.
How would you go about people not wanting "get" and "set" in their
getter and setter names?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User
Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
